—I believe that in those cases in which a man can make a credible claim that he is the father of a developing child in utero, in which he could be a proper custodian of that child, and in which he is willing to take full custody of that child upon its delivery, that the pregnant woman involved should not have the option to abort and should be civilly liable, and possibly criminally liable, for psychological suffering and wrongful death should she proceed to do so.

Dr. Keith Albow, resident Fox News homophobe and general asshole, in Men Should be Able to Veto Abortion.

(via reallyfoxnews)

Yeah, that’s all fine and dandy but I’d really like you, Keith, to ingrain this into your mind (hey, I’ll even quote you): On the subject of abortion, “you have no voice in, and, therefore, no responsibility for, the pregnancies which you help to create.”

How does that sound? A lot better than your original argument, in my humble opinion. When was the last time you carried a child to term? That’s what I thought.

Oh wait, you said something else pretty great, too: “…bringing new lives to the planet is the exclusive domain, and under the exclusive control, of women.” Granted, this quote was taken out of context. I understand you hate women and could possibly like children just fine, Keith, so I won’t tarnish your sparkling reputation by suggesting you’re any kind of advocate for women’s health. I would, however, highly recommend you re-read and think about the logic of your article. For being a Rational Man, you’re sure as hell acting like a little boy. Keep your hands, and “ideals”, to yourself.

xoxo,

The Feminist Press

(via reallyfoxnews-deactivated201110)